Observability for Delegated Execution in Agentic AI Systems
Abhinav Mishra, Kumar Sharad
- Published
- Jun 8, 2026 — 16:10 UTC
Problem
The paper addresses a significant gap in the observability of delegated execution within agentic AI systems, particularly those utilizing large language models (LLMs). Current audit logs and execution traces fail to differentiate between multiple delegation assignments, leading to ambiguity in reconstructing actions taken under specific delegations. This issue is exacerbated in dynamic environments where agents select tools and execute tasks in varying sequences, often spawning sub-agents. The authors highlight that existing security and tracing frameworks lack the necessary semantics to accurately attribute actions to their respective delegations, making it difficult to perform forensic analysis across heterogeneous systems. This work is presented as a preprint and has not yet undergone peer review.
Method
The authors propose an agent-aware observability substrate that consists of a lightweight gateway and a unified information model. This architecture is designed to bind delegation context at execution time, facilitating reliable reconstruction of delegation-scoped actions. The gateway acts as an intermediary that captures execution data while maintaining the context of delegation. The common information model standardizes the representation of actions and their associated delegation contexts, enabling direct forensic queries without relying on heuristic time-window correlations. The paper emphasizes the importance of focusing on delegation-scoped attribution and access/share footprint reconstruction rather than intent inference or reasoning reconstruction.
Results
While specific quantitative results are not provided in the abstract, the authors claim that their proposed observability substrate significantly enhances the ability to reconstruct delegation-scoped actions compared to existing methods. They suggest that their approach allows for more reliable forensic queries and better attribution of actions to specific delegations, although detailed performance metrics and comparisons against named baselines are not disclosed in the provided text.
Limitations
The authors acknowledge that their approach is limited to the reconstruction of actions under specific delegations and does not address intent inference or reasoning reconstruction. Additionally, the reliance on a common information model may introduce challenges in integrating with existing systems that do not conform to this model. The paper does not discuss potential scalability issues or the computational overhead introduced by the lightweight gateway, which could impact performance in high-throughput environments.
Why it matters
This work has significant implications for the security and accountability of agentic AI systems, particularly as they become more prevalent in complex environments. By providing a framework for delegation-scoped execution reconstruction, the authors contribute to enhancing the transparency and traceability of actions taken by AI agents. This is crucial for ensuring compliance with regulatory standards and improving trust in AI systems. The findings and methodologies presented in this paper could inform future research in AI system observability and security, as discussed in related works on agentic AI and delegation frameworks, as published in arXiv.
By Turing Wire editorial staff · Jun 8, 2026 · Editorial standards →
Source: arXiv cs.AI