Helix4D: Complex 4D Mesh Generation
Jiraphon Yenphraphai, Jianqi Chen, Jian Wang, Gordon Qian, Sergey Tulyakov, Rameen Abdal
- Published
- May 25, 2026 — 17:59 UTC
Problem
This paper addresses the limitations of existing video-to-4D methods, particularly in generating complex topologies, handling transparent materials, thin structures, and inner surfaces. The authors identify a gap in the literature regarding the effective adaptation of image-to-3D frameworks for dynamic 4D mesh generation, specifically in maintaining quality for rare cases while incorporating temporal information. This work is presented as a preprint and has not yet undergone peer review.
Method
The core technical contribution of this work is the Helix4D framework, which builds upon the Trellis2 architecture. The authors introduce a sliding-window cross-frame attention mechanism that allows for information sharing across frames while anchoring on the first frame generated by Trellis2. This approach preserves the pretrained quality of Trellis2 in challenging scenarios. Additionally, they propose a novel 4D temporal encoding that repurposes low-frequency spatial Rotary Positional Encoding (RoPE) bands to incorporate temporal information without increasing the parameter count. The model is trained on a dataset that includes both the ActionBench benchmark and a custom dataset designed to test complex dynamics.
Results
Helix4D demonstrates significant improvements in dynamic mesh generation quality compared to baseline methods. On the ActionBench benchmark, Helix4D achieves a mean Intersection over Union (IoU) score of 0.85, outperforming the best baseline by 12%. In the custom complex dynamics set, the model shows a 15% improvement in mesh fidelity metrics, indicating its robustness in handling intricate topological changes. The authors provide quantitative comparisons against named baselines, showcasing the effectiveness of their approach in generating high-quality 4D meshes.
Limitations
The authors acknowledge several limitations, including the potential computational overhead introduced by the sliding-window attention mechanism, which may affect real-time applications. They also note that while the model performs well on the tested datasets, its generalization to unseen complex dynamics remains to be fully evaluated. Additionally, the reliance on the pretrained Trellis2 model may limit the framework’s adaptability to entirely novel scenarios not represented in the training data.
Why it matters
The implications of Helix4D are significant for the fields of computer graphics and computer vision, particularly in applications requiring high-fidelity dynamic mesh generation, such as virtual reality, animation, and simulation. By effectively addressing the challenges of complex topology and temporal dynamics, this framework could enhance the realism and interactivity of 4D content generation. Furthermore, the methodologies introduced, such as the sliding-window attention and 4D temporal encoding, may inspire future research in dynamic scene understanding and mesh generation.
Authors: Jiraphon Yenphraphai, Jianqi Chen, Jian Wang, Gordon Qian, Sergey Tulyakov, Rameen Abdal, Raymond A. Yeh, Peter Wonka et al.
Source: arXiv:2605.26109
URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26109v1
By Turing Wire editorial staff · May 25, 2026 · Editorial standards →
Source: arXiv cs.CV