TokenCast: Forecasting Token Consumption During LLM Agent Execution
Chaoqian Ouyang, Ling Yue, Libin Zheng, Huanghui Guo, Shengxiang Xu, YiShu Wang, Ran Li, Jian Yin, Shaowu Pan, Shimin Di
- Published
- Sep 28, 2026 — 17:59 UTC
Problem
Token consumption during the execution of large language model (LLM) agents exhibits substantial variability across different runs, complicating the ability to predict resource usage effectively. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a predictive model that can better estimate token consumption, which is crucial for optimizing resource allocation in LLM applications. The work is presented as a preprint and has not undergone peer review.
Method
The authors propose TokenCast, an architecture designed to learn a composable cost representation for execution segments of LLM agents. The model is evaluated across four distinct task suites and six different agent models, although specific details regarding the training compute resources utilized are not disclosed. The prediction mechanism operates with a mean cumulative prediction time of 32.8 milliseconds per run, as verified on the SWE-bench benchmark.
Results
TokenCast demonstrates a mean absolute error reduction of 14.5% compared to the strongest comparator in the study. Additionally, when applied to offline budget-control replay scenarios, TokenCast achieves an average reduction of 21.3% in token usage compared to a fixed-budget policy, indicating its effectiveness in optimizing token consumption during agent execution.
Limitations
The authors do not report any limitations in their work, and no obvious limitations are identified in the available text.
Why it matters
The implications of this research are significant for downstream applications of LLMs, particularly in environments where resource management is critical. By improving the predictability of token consumption, TokenCast can facilitate more efficient execution of LLM agents, potentially leading to cost savings and enhanced performance in real-world applications.
By Callan Zhang · Sep 28, 2026 · Editorial standards →
Summarised from the primary source with AI assistance under human editorial oversight. Turing Wire is not a primary source — read the original for the authoritative account.
Source: arXiv cs.AI
